[Ni (NH3)6]2+paramagnetic while [Ni (CN) 6]4-diamagnetic
Why is [Ni (NH3)6]2+paramagnetic while [Ni (CN) 6]4-diamagnetic?
In the both cases, the co-ordination number of nickel
is six with octahedral geometry. The oxidation number of nickel is +2 with 3d8
system.
Crystal field theory
requires the splitting of the degenerate d-orbitals with the approaching of the
ligands.
Therefore, under the influence of octahedral crystalfield, the d-orbitals are split up into set of energetically different
orbitals.
One is energetically higher eg level and the other is
energetically lower t2g level.
Now, in case of [Ni
(NH3)6]2+complex ion, the ligand NH3
is neither a strong field ligand nor a weak field ligand. Actually, it is mild
strong field ligand.
But in case of [Ni (NH3)6]2+
ion, ligand NH3 act as a weak field ligand as crystal field
stabilization energy is less than pairing energy. That is, 10Dq < P.
Therefore, under the influence of octahedral crystal
field, the electronic configuration is t2g6 eg2.
From the above electronic configuration, it has been
found that the complex has two unpaired electrons. Hence the complex [Ni (NH3)6]2+ is
paramagnetic.
On the other hand, in case of [Ni (CN) 6]4- complex ion, the ligand CN–is
sufficiently strong field ligand. Hence, in this case the interactions are much
more.
So, the single electron in dx2-y2 orbital is
repelled by the four ligands whereas the electron in the dz2 orbital
is repelled by only two ligands.
Thus, the energy of dx2-y2 orbital becomes
higher than that of dz2 orbital.
Hence, in presence of a
sufficiently strong field ligand the energy difference between these two
orbitals exceeds the pairing energy of the electrons. That is, 10Dq > P.
Under this condition, in order to get a more stable
configuration both eg electrons are paired up and occupy the low
lying dz2 orbital leaving the dx2-y2 orbital empty.
Therefore, the preferred electronic configuration is
dxz2, dyz2, dz22, dxy2, dx2-y20.
From the above electronic configuration, it has been
found that the complex has no unpaired electrons. Hence the complex [Ni (CN) 6]4- is
diamagnetic.
Why is [Ni (NH3)6]2+paramagnetic while [Ni (CN) 6]4-diamagnetic?
Why
is [Ni (NH3)6]2+ ion paramagnetic?
Why
is [Ni (CN) 6]4- ion diamagnetic?
What
is the hybridization of [Ni (NH3)6]2+ and [Ni
(CN) 6]4- complex ions?
No comments